JOLES

v.

LOUISIANA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Sangineto-Miranda, 859 F.2d 1501 (6th Cir. 1988)
  …fifth amendment violation and the “fruits” may be admissible in the Government’s case in chief. United States v. Bengivenga, 845 F. 2d 593 (5th Cir.1988) (en banc); United [*1518] States v. Cherry, 794 F. 2d 201, 207-08 (5th Cir.1986); cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1056, 107 S.Ct. 932, 93 L.Ed.2d 983 (1987); United States v. Cherry, 759 F. 2d 1196, 1208-10 (5th Cir.1985). See Elstad, 470 U.S. at 308, 105 S.Ct. at 1292-93 (“We believe that [the] reasoning [of Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 433, 94 S.Ct. 2357, 41 L.Ed.…
• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. World Travel Vacation Brokers, Inc., 861 F.2d 1020 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …ppellant desires to litigate. In addition, the issues must be supported by appropriate judicial authority. Id.; see Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, 796 F. 2d 217, 220 (7th Cir.1986); Sanchez v. Miller, 792 F. 2d 694, 703 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1056, 107 S.Ct. 933, 93 L.Ed.2d 984 (1987). “It is not the obli [*1026] gation of this court to research and construct the legal arguments open to parties, especially when they are represented by counsel.” Sanchez, 792 F. 2d at 703. Beard v. Whitley Cou…
• United States v. Adamo, 882 F.2d 1218 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …other person. We stated: “ ‘It is not the obligation of this court to research and construct the legal arguments open to parties, especially when they are represented by counsel.’ [Sanchez v. Miller, 792 F. 2d 694, 703 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1056 [107 S.Ct. 933, 93 L.Ed.2d 984] (1987) ].... Williams has failed even to identify the facts necessary to support the issue he raises. Although the United States Attorney has made a fine attempt to identify the ‘certain conversations’ that Williams c…