SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ET AL.

U.S. | 1986-10-20
No. 86-90
Justice Blackmun and Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
479 U.S. 923 Supreme Court of the United States (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Palmer v. BRG OF Ga., Inc., 874 F.2d 1417 (11th Cir. 1989)
    …tention given to procompetitive, efficiency-creating integration that is accomplished as the result of an outwardly anticompetitive, yet ancillary, restraint. National Bancard Corp. v. VISA, U.S.A., Inc., 779 F. 2d 592 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 923, 107 S.Ct. 329, 93 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986). Here, in contrast, the record is devoid of any evidence that the agreement between HBJ and BRG was ancillary or that it had some procompetitive, efficiency-creating potential. Furthermore, there is no evidence…
  • …notes omitted); see also San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. NRC, 751 F. 2d 1287, 1314 (D.C.Cir.1984) (SLO) (lifting of a license suspension is not an amendment to the license), reh’g en banc on other grounds, 789 F. 2d 26 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 923, 107 S.Ct. 330, 93 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986). We adopt this reasoning and hold that the imposition of 47 requirements on Edison prior to restart was not a license amendment. The exemption to the regulation requiring biennial emergency drills raises a diff…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw