JARVIS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• Baxter v. Thomas, 45 F.3d 1501 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …imself was aware of the order. Thus, there is no Brady violation. See United States v. Davis, 787 F. 2d 1501, 1505 (11th Cir.) (“Brady rule does not apply if the evidence in question is available to the defendant from other sources”), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 852, 107 S.Ct. 184, 93 L.Ed.2d 118 (1986). Finally, with respect to evidence that Baxter contends shows that McWilliams made a deal in exchange for his testimony, McWilliams, as well as the Assistant District Attorney and a law enforcement agent from H…
• United States v. Amjad Awan, 966 F.2d 1415 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …o establish criminal intent, in the face of no other independent evidence to that effect. We review the district court’s admission of opinion evidence for abuse of discretion. United States v. Davis, 787 F. 2d 1501, 1505 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 852, 107 S.Ct. 184, 93 L.Ed.2d 118 (1986). The appellants cite numerous examples of Agent Mazur’s interpretative testimony that allegedly imputed knowledge and willfulness of criminal conduct to the defendants by recasting innocuous comments made by th…
• United States v. Myers, 972 F.2d 1566 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …sibility of lay opinion testimony is committed to the sound discretion of the district court and will not be overturned on appeal unless there is clear abuse of discretion. See United States v. Davis, 787 F. 2d 1501, 1505 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 852, 107 S.Ct. 184, 93 L.Ed.2d 118 (1986). Rule 701 of the Federal Rules of Evidence permits a lay witness to offer his opinion if it is “rationally based on the perception of the witness and [is] helpful to a clear understanding of [the witness’s] tes…