STAWICKI

v.

ISRAEL, SUPERINTENDENT, WAUPUN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1990)
  …om their taped conversation concerning the homicide. Especially since “the scope and extent of cross-examination are generally within the sound discretion of the trial court,” United States v. Pedroza, 750 F. 2d 187, 195 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 842, 107 S.Ct. 151, 93 L.Ed.2d 92 (1986), we see no reversible error here. Finally, the government’s rebuttal summation properly referred to these conversations to rebut Flores’ contention, in summation, that Flores was subservient to one “Mario,” a no…
• United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …nation lie within the discretion of the trial judge. United States v. Blanco, 861 F. 2d 773, 781 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 1139, 103 L.Ed.2d 200 (1989); United States v. Pedroza, 750 F. 2d 187, 195 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 842, 107 S.Ct. 151, 93 L.Ed.2d 92 (1986). A trial judge’s evidentiary rulings will not be disturbed unless the judge acted “arbitrarily or irrationally.” United States v. Blanco, 861 F. 2d at 781. See also, United States v. Jamil, 707 F. 2d 638, 642 (…
• United States v. Manner, 887 F.2d 317 (D.C. Cir. 1989)
  …are stipulation” would not take intent out of a case in which the defendant offered "rather unusual theories” to explain the course of events. United States v. Pedroza, 750 F. 2d 187, 201 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied sub nom. Pelaes v. United States, 479 U.S. 842, 107 S.Ct. 151, 93 L.Ed.2d 92 (1986). We need not rely on Pedroza, however, because Leeper’s offers of stipulation and concession were far less unequivocal than Mohel's. Although the circuits remain divided as to whether stipulations or concessions…