PUGLISI ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Villegas, 899 F.2d 1324 (2d Cir. 1990)
  …30 (1984) (beeper). This principle has also been applied by this Court to uphold a warrant authorizing the gathering of visual information through the use of a video camera. See United States v. Biasucci, 786 F. 2d 504, 509 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 827,107 S.Ct. 104, 93 L.Ed.2d 54 (1986); accord United States v. Torres, 751 F. 2d at 883 (upholding warrant authorizing television surveillance of “safe house”); see also United States v. Taborda, 635 F. 2d 131, 139 (2d Cir.1980) (warrant required for…
• United States v. Simmons, 923 F.2d 934 (2d Cir. 1991)
  …ments alone do not justify a new trial. See United States v. Biasucci, 786 F. 2d 504, 514 (2d Cir.) (inappropriate Government comments, standing alone in an otherwise fair proceeding, are normally not a basis to overturn a conviction), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 827, 107 S.Ct. 104, 93 L.Ed.2d 54 (1986). B. Pre-Indictment Delay Peter Monsanto, Eobert Cofer, Gary Simmons, Alex Simmons, Miriam Baker and Sedgwick Harvey argue that they suffered undue delay in being prosecuted for their federal crimes. This claim…
• United States v. Rivera, 971 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1992)
  …144 (1986) (same); United States v. Biasucci, 786 F. 2d 504, 514 (2d Cir.) (“criminal convictions are not to be lightly overturned on the basis of a prosecutor’s inappropriate comments standing alone in an otherwise fair proceeding”), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 827, 107 S.Ct. 104, 93 L.Ed.2d 54 (1986). In addition, in determining a claim of prejudicial error, we weigh “the extent to which the misconduct was intentional and the extent to which the statements were made in response to defense contentions.” Módica…