SHOECRAFT

v.

CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES BUREAU, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Rolling v. State, 695 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 1997)
  …nited States Supreme Court has not previously addressed a particular search and seizure issue which comes before us for review, we are free to look to our own precedent for guidance. See State v. Cross, 487 So. 2d 1056, 1057 (Fla.), cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 805, 107 S.Ct. 248, 93 L.Ed.2d 172 (1986).…
• Soca v. State, 673 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1996)
  …ted States Supreme Court has not previously addressed a particular search and seizure issue which comes before us for review, we will look to our own precedent for guidance. See Traylor, State v. Cross, 487 So. 2d 1056, 1057 (Fla.), cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 805, 107 S.Ct. 248, 93 L.Ed.2d 172 (1986). We find no controlling U.S. Supreme Court decision on point to overrule our holding in Grubbs. The State argues that the issue is controlled by United States Supreme Court decisions in Abel v. United States, 3…
• State v. Boyd, 615 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
  …rolling factors surrounding the legality of war-rantless searches of a person’s home have been rather frequently pronounced by the courts of this state. In Cross v. State, 469 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 2d DCA1985), affirmed, 487 So. 2d 1056, cert. dismissed, 479 U.S. 805, 107 S.Ct. 248, 93 L.Ed.2d 172 (1986), this court clearly pronounced its own understanding and conclusions regarding these factors as follows: Warrantless searches are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution…