IOWA EX REL. MILLER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF IOWA, ET AL.
v.
LYNG, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL.; AND LYNG, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL. V. IOWA EX REL. MILLER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF IOWA, ET AL.
IOWA EX REL. MILLER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF IOWA, ET AL.
LYNG, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL.; AND LYNG, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL. V. IOWA EX REL. MILLER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF IOWA, ET AL.
478 U.S. 1012
Supreme Court of the United States (1986)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wyoming v. Oklahoma, 502 U.S. 437 (U.S. 1992)…omy and thereby caused a decline in general tax revenues. See, e. g., Pennsylvania v. Kleppe, 174 U. S. App. D. C. 441, 533 F. 2d 668, cert. denied, 429 U. S. 977 (1976); State of Iowa ex rel. Miller v. Block, 771 F. 2d 347 (CA8 1985), cert. denied, 478 U. S. 1012 (1986). He concluded, however, that none of these cases was analogous to this one because none of them involved a direct injury in the form of a loss of specific tax revenues — an undisputed fact here. See n. 6, supra. In our view, the Master’s conc…
-
Danny and Carene Gettler v. Lyng, 857 F.2d 1195 (8th Cir. 1988)…etary contended that promulgation of regulations to implement the SDPP was entirely discretionary. The district court agreed and dismissed the action. We reversed. See Iowa ex rel. Miller v. Block, 771 F. 2d 347, 351-52 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1012, 106 S.Ct. 3312, 92 L.Ed.2d 725 (1986). We held that the Secretary had a duty to promulgate regulations, and remanded the case to the district court. Id. at 355. The district court remanded to the agency for “promulgation and implementation of regul…