NANTAHALA POWER & LIGHT CO. ET AL.

v.

THORNBURG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Elks Nat'l Found. v. Weber, 942 F.2d 1480 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …allege that the state court’s action was unconstitutional. Review of those decisions may be had only in this Court. 460 U.S. at 486, 103 S.Ct. at 1317. The McDonald assignees cite only Robinson v. Ariyoshi, 753 F. 2d 1468 (9th Cir.1985), vacated, 477 U.S. 902, 106 S.Ct. 3269, 91 L.Ed.2d 560 (1986), (Robinson I), in their attempt to find grounds for subject-matter jurisdiction in the federal district court. Their reliance on that case is both misplaced and ill-advised. The Robinson case arose out of a de…
• Selwyn A. Robinson under the Will of Alymer F. Robinson v. Ariyoshi, 933 F.2d 781 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …e regulations to the property at issue.” Id. at 186, 105 S.Ct. at 3116. With instructions to reconsider the matter in light of Williamson, the Supreme Court vacated this court’s affirmance of an earlier decision for plaintiffs. Ariyoshi v. Robinson, 477 U.S. 902, 106 S.Ct. 3269, 91 L.Ed.2d 560 (1986). The victories won by plaintiffs were thus swept away by application of the ripeness doctrine. Contending that plaintiffs ultimately failed to obtain judicial relief because of the lack of ripeness of their…
• Selwyn A. Robinson v. Ariyoshi, 854 F.2d 1189 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …rt. Ill, § 2. The Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 105 S.Ct. 3108, 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985). Ariyoshi v. Robinson, 477 U.S. 902, 106 S.Ct. 3269, 91 L.Ed.2d 560 (1986). In accordance with the Supreme Court’s order, we vacated the district court’s judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of Williamson County. Robinson v. Ariyoshi, 796 F. 2d 339 (9th Cir.1986).…