DIBERNARDO ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• United States v. Norton, 867 F.2d 1354 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …00 L.Ed. at 402-03. This court consistently has followed the Costello rule to preclude appellate review of sufficiency of the evidence before the grand jury. See, e.g., United States v. DiBernardo, 775 F. 2d 1470, 1478 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105, 106 S.Ct. 1948, 90 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); United States v. Cruz, 478 F. 2d 408, 412 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Aleman v. United States, 414 U.S. 910, 94 S.Ct. 259, 38 L.Ed.2d 148 (1973); Cohen v. United States, 436 F. 2d 586, 587 (5th Cir.), ce…
• United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross, 928 F.2d 1030 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …r curiam). The existence of a conspiracy may be demonstrated by direct or circumstantial proof, including inferences from statements or conduct of the participants. United States v. Lignarolo, 770 F. 2d 971, 978 n. 9 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105, 106 S.Ct. 1948, 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986). Similarly, the defendant’s knowledge of and membership in the conspiracy may be proven by acts on his part which furthered the goal of the conspiracy.32 United States v. Morales, 868 F. 2d 1562, 1572 (11th C…
• United States v. Evans H. Starke, Jr., 62 F.3d 1374 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …t the defendant may have been convicted on a ground not alleged by the grand jury’s indictment.’ ” United States v. Lignarolo, 770 F. 2d 971, 981 n. 15 (11th Cir.1985) (quoting United States v. Ylda, 653 F. 2d 912, 914 (5th Cir.1981)), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1105, 106 S.Ct. 1948, 90 L.Ed.2d 358 (1986). In the deliberate ignorance instruction, the court stated that the “Defendant acted knowingly if ... [he] actually knew that the money of the undercover agents was derived from an unlawful activity ... or ...…