HUMBLE EXPLORATION CO., INC., ET AL.
v.
BROWNING ET AL.; WHEATON V. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY ET AL.; TUCKER ET AL. V. MASCHNER, WARDEN, ET AL.; PRANTIL V. CALIFORNIA; SMIGA V. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC.

U.S. | 1986-04-28
Nos. 85-1182; No. 85-1185; No. 85-6186; No. 85-6201; No. 85-6212
Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
475 U.S. 1151 Supreme Court of the United States (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In re McDONALD, 489 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1989)
    …supersedeas bond); McDonald v. Tennessee, 429 U. S. 1012 (1976) (stay and other relief); McDonald v. Tennessee, 415 U. S. 971 (1974) (stay). See McDonald v. Alabama, 480 U. S. 912 (1987); In re McDonald, 479 U. S. 956 (1986); McDonald v. Tennessee, 475 U. S. 1151 (1986); In re McDonald, 471 U. S. 1062 (1985); McDonald v. Leech, 467 U. S. 1257 (1984); McDonald v. Draper, 459 U. S. 1229 (1983); McDonald v. Thompson, 457 U. S. 1126 (1982); McDonald v. Draper, 451 U. S. 933 (1981); McDonald v. Tennessee, 425 U.…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw