FOREMAN
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1985-12-09
No. 85-5709
474 U.S. 1023 Supreme Court of the United States (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Vinton Bedonie and Thomas Cly, 913 F.2d 782 (10th Cir. 1990)
    …of voir dire examination is [also] a matter within the sound discretion of the trial judge and will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion.” United States v. Espinosa, 771 F. 2d 1382, 1405 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1023, 106 S.Ct. 579, 88 L.Ed.2d 561 (1985). The court’s discretion will not be disturbed “ ‘unless it appears from the record that [the court’s] voir dire was inadequate to properly test the qualifications and competency of the prospective jurors to sit…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw