SPARROW

v.

HAJIMAHOLIS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Felix, 867 F.2d 1068 (8th Cir. 1989)
  …ep’ towards the commission of the substantive offense which strongly corroborates the actor’s criminal intent.” United States v. Joyce, 693 F. 2d 838, 841 (8th Cir.1982). Accord United States v. Mazzella, 768 F. 2d 235, 239 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1006, 106 S.Ct. 528, 88 L.Ed.2d 460 (1985). With regard to the first element, evidence was presented that Felix actively learned to cook methamphetamine, toward that end supplied his instructor with methamphetamine-making chemicals and equipment, and eve…
• United States v. Overmyer, 899 F.2d 457 (6th Cir. 1990)
  …. Because of the well-accepted principle that grand jury indictments are presumed valid, we exercise extreme caution in dismissing an indictment for alleged grand jury misconduct. United States v. Jones, 766 F. 2d 994, 1001 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1006, 106 S.Ct. 526, 88 L.Ed.2d 458 (1985); Beatrice Foods Co. v. United States, 312 F. 2d 29, 39 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 904, 83 S.Ct. 1289, 10 L.Ed.2d 199 (1963). Courts do not encourage tampering with the grand jury indictment even where fa…