COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY

v.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES ASSN., LOCAL 660, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield OF Ala., Inc., 898 F.2d 1556 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …that an action is arbitrary and capricious as a matter of law subject to de novo review. See, e.g., Harris v. Pullman Standard, Inc., 809 F. 2d 1495, 1499 (11th Cir.1987); Anderson v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 759 F. 2d 1518, 1522 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 995, 106 S.Ct. 410, 88 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985); McKnight v. Southern Life & Health Ins. Co., 758 F. 2d 1566, 1569 (11th Cir.1985); Helms v. Monsanto Co., 728 F. 2d 1416 (11th Cir.1984). But Guy should not be read so literally. The discussion following the…
• Vermeulen v. Renault, 985 F.2d 1534 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …n entity “a majority of whose shares or other ownership interest is owned by a foreign state” is itself deemed a “foreign state” for purposes of federal jurisdiction. Arango v. Guzman Travel Advisors, 761 F. 2d 1527, 1533 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 995, 106 S.Ct. 408, 88 L.Ed.2d 359 (1985). As such, it is not considered a “citizen” or “subject” of a foreign state for purposes of section 1332(a). Goar v. Compania Peruana de Vapores, 688 F. 2d 417, 421 (5th Cir.1982); Ruggiero v. Compania Peruana…
• Long Island Lighting Co. v. Town OF Brookhaven, 889 F.2d 428 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …ilability of a state-court § 1983 action strongly supports the withholding of federal jurisdiction); accord Brooks v. Nance, 801 F. 2d 1237, 1240 (10th Cir.1986); Miller v. City of Los Ange- [*433] les, 755 F. 2d 1390, 1391 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 995, 106 S.Ct. 408, 88 L.Ed.2d 359 (1985); 423 South Salina Street, 566 F.Supp. at 492. Finally, we are not persuaded that even the pending article 7 tax certiorari proceedings are procedurally inadequate. Only three of LILCO’s numerous assertions of p…