GRACZYK ET AL.

v.

UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA

Citator

Cited By

• Price v. Price, 929 F.2d 131 (4th Cir. 1991)
  …of the parties, the types of vehicles and instrumentalities involved, the causation and type of injury, and traditional concepts of the role of admiralty); see also Oman v. Johns-Manville Corp., 764 F. 2d 224, 230 and n. 3 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 970, 106 S.Ct. 351, 88 L.Ed.2d 319 (1985). In Sisson, however, the Supreme Court redirected the inquiry from an examination of the particular circumstances of the tort in question to a more generalized analysis to determine whether principles applicabl…
• Willis v. Raymark Indus., Inc., 905 F.2d 793 (4th Cir. 1990)
  …r.1984). Comment n was recently considered by this Court in the context of an action very similar on its facts to that involved in the instant appeal. Oman v. Johns-Manville Corp., 764 F. 2d 224 (4th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Oman v. H.K. Porter, 474 U.S. 970, 106 S.Ct. 351, 88 L.Ed.2d 319 (1985). Oman is dispositive of this issue. In Oman, this Court, sitting en banc, construed Comment n as requiring the balancing of the following factors to determine the extent of a manufacturer’s duty to warn; (1) t…
• Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc. v. United States, 846 F.2d 888 (3d Cir. 1988)
  …and instrumentalities involved; (3) the causation and nature of the injury suffered; and (4) traditional concepts of the role of maritime law. Drake, 772 F. 2d at 1015-16; Oman v. Johns-Manyule Corp., 764 F. 2d 224, 230 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 970, 106 S.Ct. 351, 88 L.Ed.2d 319 (1985); Myhran v. Johns-Manville Corp., 741 F. 2d 1119, 1121 (9th Cir.1984); Harville v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., 731 F. 2d 775, 783-87 (11th Cir.1984). We find this analysis not only compelling, but also requir…

  ← 1 / 2 →