RICKUS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. D'Antoni, 874 F.2d 1214 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …federal law, the district judge did not err in admitting it. As the government points out in its brief, other sanctions already exist to control the conduct of state officers. United States v. Rickus, 737 F. 2d 360, 364 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 921, 106 S.Ct. 252, 88 L.Ed.2d 260 (1985). See also Shaffer, 520 F. 2d at 1372. C. Outrageous Governmental Conduct Daniel D’Antoni appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial based on an argument of outrageous governmental conduc…
• United States v. Armand Gravely, 840 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1988)
  …to insure that witnesses are treated fairly and the search for truth is not impaired by presentation of extraneous, prejudicial or confusing material. Fed.R.Evid. 611. See United States v. Atwell, 766 F. 2d 416, 419-20 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 921, 106 S.Ct. 251, 88 L.Ed.2d 259 (1985) (limiting the extent of cross-examination is within the discretion of the trial court and does not warrant reversal absent an abuse of discretion clearly prejudicial to the defendant); United States v. Cole, 622…