IN THE MATTER OF FRED R. C. KOESTER. PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT TO THE FLORIDA BAR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Fred Koester, a 74-year-old attorney suspended from practice in 1965 following a federal income tax evasion conviction, petitioned for reinstatement. The Florida Supreme Court granted reinstatement, finding that Koester had served his sentence, paid his fine, completed parole with a favorable report, and demonstrated rehabilitation through testimony from reputable Jacksonville Bar members.
The court held that Koester, now 74 years old, had served his sentence, paid his fine, proved his rehabilitation, and was entitled to resume the practice of law. The suspension imposed on September 22, 1965 was terminated and Koester's name was restored to the roll of practicing attorneys.
“suspended from the practice of law for one year and thereafter until he shall have paid the costs of this proceeding and until he demonstrates to the Board of Governors and this Court that he is entitled to resume the practice of law”
The original September 22, 1965 suspension order that Koester sought to overturn
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceKoester was convicted of federal income tax evasion on May 13, 1963, following a nolo contendere plea and sentenced to one year and one day imprisonme…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Reinstatement cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause recurs on application of petitioner to have restored his privilege to practice law, having been on September 22nd, 1965 “suspended from the practice of law for one year and thereafter until he shall have paid the costs of this proceeding and until he demonstrates to the Board of Governors and this Court that he is entitled to resume the practice of law.” The history, background, disciplinary proceeding and final action are reported in the case of The Florida Bar v. Koester, Fla., 178 So.2d 584.
Petitioner was adjudged guilty of a federal income tax evasion on May 13, 1963, following his plea of nolo contendere. The U. S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida sentenced him to serve one year and one day and to pay a fine of $2500.00. He commenced his confinement on May 27th, 1963, was released on parole November 19th, 1963, and completed his parole period with a favorable report on June 1st, 1964. He paid the fine imposed by the court.
Petitioner is now seventy-four years of age and, except for the period of suspension, has been a practicing attorney in Jacksonville, Florida, since 1916, enjoying during that period a good reputation for honesty and fair-dealing, which excellent background was noted in the decision of this court, supra. Koester supported his petition for reinstatement with the testimony of five reputable members of the Jacksonville Bar, all of whom testified in support of his rehabilitation. The Florida Bar offered no testimony in rebuttal. Surprisingly, the referee recommended against his reinstatement, and The Florida Bar has joined in that recommendation to us.
Now, having heard argument, having examined the record, and having considered the circumstances of the original disciplinary action, it is our opinion, and we hold, that the petitioner, now seventy-four years old, has served his sentence, paid his fine, proved his rehabilitation, and that he is entitled to resume the practice of law.
Accordingly, the suspension imposed by this court on September 22nd, 1965 in the original disciplinary proceeeding is terminated, and the name of Fred R. C. Koester *116is returned to the roll of practicing attorneys in this State with all the rights, privileges and responsibilities thereunto belonging.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS (Ret.), JJ., and SPEC-TOR, District Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Se. Utils. Serv. Co. & Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Fla. Indus. Comm'n & Earl A. Niccum, 178 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 1965)