FLORIDA SANITARIUM & HOSPITAL AND SAFECO LIFECO GENERAL INSURANCE, PETITIONERS,
v.
DOROTHY M. HANNA (WATSON) AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
FLORIDA SANITARIUM & HOSPITAL AND SAFECO LIFECO GENERAL INSURANCE, PETITIONERS,
DOROTHY M. HANNA (WATSON) AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
217 So. 2d 101
Florida Supreme Court (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date August 13, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ERVIN and HOPPING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ricketts v. Haynes, 630 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…employment, and she was the equivalent of a trustee of a person. Further, it was Haynes, not Andrews, who had control over the employment relationships. See Stevens v. International Builders of Fla., Inc., 207 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 217 So. 2d 101 (Fla.1968) (in determining whether subcontractor was an employee or an independent contractor, primary test of employer-employee relationship is exercise of direction and control). Since Haynes was Ricketts’ employer, Ricketts’ sole remedy against…
-
William L v. Tri-State Motor Transit Co., 844 F.2d 1496 (11th Cir. 1988)…individual is an employee or an independent contractor should be submitted to the jury.”). . A more extensive set of factors is provided in Stevens v. International Builders of Florida, Inc., 207 So. 2d 287, 289 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.), cert. dismissed, 217 So. 2d 101 (Fla.1968): (a) The extent of control which, by the agreement, the master may exercise over the details of the work. (b) Whether or not the one employed is engaged in a distinct occupation or business. (c) The kind of occupation, with reference t…