AIRWORK SERVICE DIVISION

v.

DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION OF NEW JERSEY

Citator

Cited By

• Pullum v. Mac Johnson, 647 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
  …l debate, “[w]e expect people who engage in controversy to accept that kind of statement as their lot. We think the first amendment demands a hide that tough.” Ollman v. Evans, 750 F. 2d 970, 1005 (D.C.Cir.1984) (Bork, J., concurring), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1127, 105 S.Ct. 2662, 86 L.Ed.2d 278 (1985). We do agree, however, with the following observation contained in the concluding paragraph of the trial court’s order: Though affording protection to Defendant Johnson’s speech in the instant case, the Court…
• Kropinski v. World Plan Executive Council-Us, 853 F.2d 948 (D.C. Cir. 1988)
  …emphasis added). They also urge that the First Amendment bars fraud claims based solely on statements of opinion, just as it bars claims of libel based on statements of pure opinion. E.g., Ollman v. Evans, 750 F. 2d 970 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1127, 105 S.Ct. 2662, 86 L.Ed.2d 278 (1985). The district court properly rejected these contentions. a. Opinions as “Facts” The operative rule is that “[opinions or predictions of future events do not constitute representations of material facts upon w…