COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

v.

WEINTRAUB ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 U.S. 254 (U.S. 1986)
  …t concluded that respondent had established discrimination in the grand jury, and granted the writ. See Hillery v. Pulley, 563 F. Supp. 1228 (ED Cal. 1983). The Court of Appeals [*257] affirmed, 733 F. 2d 644 (CA9 1984), and we granted certiorari, 470 U. S. 1026 (1985). 1 — 1 I As a threshold matter, we turn to petitioner s contention that respondent has circumvented his obligation to exhaust state remedies before seeking collateral relief in federal court. 28 U. S. C. § 2254(b). The exhaustion issue had…
• Heath v. Alabama, 474 U.S. 82 (U.S. 1985)
  …tioner’s Alabama conviction was barred by this Court’s decision in Brown v. Ohio, 432 U. S. 161 (1977), and requested the parties to address the question of the applicability of the dual sovereignty doctrine to successive prosecutions by two States. 470 U. S. 1026 (1985). For the reasons explained below, we affirm the judgment of the Alabama Supreme Court. Despite the fact that this Court did not grant certiorari on the constitutional objection to Alabama’s exercise of jurisdiction, petitioner has continued…