REED
v.
TOLEDO AREA AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ET AL.

U.S. | 1985-02-19
No. 84-5884
469 U.S. 1221 Supreme Court of the United States (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Kordenbrock v. Scroggy, 889 F.2d 69 (6th Cir. 1989)
    …een months and twenty-six days,” and that he didn’t “know how to put into words how I feel.” Appellant’s opening statement. Appellant directs us to State v. Lee, 524 So. 2d 1176 (La.1987); Cannaday v. State, 455 So. 2d 713 (Miss.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1221, 105 S.Ct. 1209, 84 L.Ed.2d 351 (1985). These cases relied on the fact that the defendants’ confessions showed they had no remorse for their crimes and therefore could have influenced the jury to recommend death. However, in appellant’s case we h…
  • Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metro. Bottling Co., Inc., 915 F.2d 201 (6th Cir. 1990)
    …does not again terminate the running of the time for appeal,” Dixie Sand and Gravel v. TVA, 631 F. 2d 73, 74 (5th Cir. Unit B 1980) (followed by Reed v. Toledo Area Affirmative Action Program, 715 F. 2d 253 (6th Cir.1983) (per curiam), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1221, 105 S.Ct. 1207, 84 L.Ed.2d 350 (1985)), unless a grant of the earlier post-trial motion effectively results in a new judgment and the motion to reconsider is filed by the adversely affected party requesting reinstatement of the original judgment. Y…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw