THETFORD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Kojo Sababu, 891 F.2d 1308 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …the jury on these issues during voir dire, we have repeatedly held that a judge has broad discretion in determining what questions may be asked during voir dire. See, e.g., United States v. Hasting, 739 F. 2d 1269, 1272 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1218, 105 S.Ct. 1199, 84 L.Ed.2d 343 (1985); Fietzer v. Ford Motor Co., 622 F. 2d 281, 284 (7th Cir.1980). We have stated that “[t]his court will not find that a trial court abused its discretion in conducting voir dire where there is sufficient question…
• United States v. Alion Andersson, 813 F.2d 1450 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …on, both the Supreme Court, in Inadi and Dutton, and this court apply a hearsay exception analysis, focusing on the necessity and reliability of the testimony. See, e.g., United States v. O’Connor, 737 F. 2d 814, 819-20 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1218, 105 S.Ct. 1198, 84 L.Ed.2d 343 (1985); United States v. Tille, 729 F. 2d 615, 621 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 845, 105 S.Ct. 156, 83 L.Ed.2d 93 (1984); Layton, 720 F. 2d at 561. But see United States v. Miller, 771 F. 2d 1219, 1233, 1235 (9t…
• United States v. Darrel Paterson Simpson, 813 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …ormant to participate in the very criminal enterprise that is under investigation. See, e.g., United States v. O’Connor, 737 F. 2d 814, 817-18 (9th Cir.1984) (use of informant to sell cocaine provided by government was not outrageous), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1218, 105 S.Ct. 1198, 84 L.Ed.2d 343 (1985); see also United States v. Bowling, 666 F. 2d 1052, 1054-55 (6th Cir.1981) (informant’s participation in nonviolent property crimes held not to be outrageous), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 960, 102 S.Ct. 1475, 71 L.E…