YARRINGTON

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 (U.S. 1986)
  …(CA2 1984) (prosecu-torial practice of interviewing defendants in the absence of counsel before arraignment “raises serious constitutional questions” and “contravene[s] the principles of DR7-104(A)(1)), cert, denied sub nom. Edler v. United States, 469 U. S. 1161 (1985); State v. Yatman, 320 So. 2d 401, 403 (Fla.App. 1975) (“Disciplinary Rule 7-104 of the Code of Professional Responsibility applies equally to lawyers involved in the prosecution of criminal cases as in civil cases. ... If any communication wi…
• Moon v. Lanson Newsome, 863 F.2d 835 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …indigents ‘as in other cases’ ”); Cotner v. Hopkins, 795 F. 2d 900, 902 (10th Cir.1986) (imposition of $1,000 fine on inmate litigant not presumptively objectionable); Carter v. United States, 733 F. 2d 735, 737 (10th Cir.1984), [*838] cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1161, 105 S.Ct. 915, 83 L.Ed.2d 928 (1985) (“We agree that sanctions are an appropriate remedy to prevent abuse of the judicial process. Restrictive conditions, other than total preclusion, which are available include assessment of damages to the prevail…
• Thomas v. Cap. Sec. Servs., Inc., 836 F.2d 866 (5th Cir. 1988)
  …rt had abused its discretion by imposing such a fine without affording the plaintiff appropriate procedural protections, the Tenth Circuit referred back to its previous opinion in Carter v. United States, 733 F. 2d 735 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1161, 105 S.Ct. 915, 83 L.Ed.2d 928 (1985), wherein the court had held that sanctions cannot result in total preclusion of access to the courts. Consistent with the Carter holding, the Cotner court stated with respect to sanctions, whose prepayment may h…