REIDA DECOIL, APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH DECOIL, APPELLEE
REIDA DECOIL, APPELLANT,
JOSEPH DECOIL, APPELLEE
216 So. 2d 39
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
Appellant appeals an interlocutory order entered by the chancellor below and the appellee has filed a cross appeal.
We have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs filed herein and hold that the order appealed is supported by competent substantial evidence and no abuse of discretion has been shown.
Affirmed.
LILES, C. J., and HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Fam. Bank OF Hallandale, 667 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…a valid stop payment order. The general rule that an assignee occupies the same position as the assignor is subject to the qualification that equitable principles, such as estoppel, may be applied to alleviate harsh operation. Finesmith v. Singer, 216 So. 2d 39, 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). We do not consider, however, this to be a proper case for the application of estoppel. In so saying, we are strongly persuaded by First National Bank of Birmingham v. Department of Revenue, 364 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978),…
-
Reida DeCOIL v. DeCOIL, 225 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 1969)…Certiorari denied without opinion. 216 So. 2d 39.…
-
Agustin Garcia, M.D. v. Abbey Found., Inc., 567 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…pare Wynne v. Ludman Corp., 79 So. 2d 690 (Fla.1955) (summary judgment affirmed where employment contract was terminable by the employer at any time). Further, whether an estoppel exists depends on the circumstances of the case. Finesmith v. Singer, 216 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). The existence of disputed facts involving estoppel presents a question for determination by the trier of facts. 28 Am.Jur.2d Estoppel and Waiver § 149 (1966). The amended final summary judgment is reversed and the cause remanded…