KINZHUMA
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1984-12-10
No. 84-5081
469 U.S. 1088 Supreme Court of the United States (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Darcy L. Schaill v. Tippecanoe Cnty. Sch. Corp., 864 F.2d 1309 (7th Cir. 1988)
    …tute searches subject to the requirements of the fourth amendment. See, e.g., Burnett v. Municipality of Anchorage, 806 F. 2d 1447, 1449 (9th Cir.1986) (breath analysis); United States v. Vega-Barvo, 729 F. 2d 1341 (11th Cir.) (X-ray), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1088, 105 S.Ct. 597, 83 L.Ed.2d 706 (1984); Bouse v. Bussey, 573 F. 2d 548, 550 (9th Cir.1977) (compelled removal of pubic hair sample); Thornburg v. Dora, 677 F.Supp. 581, 586-87 (S.D.Ind.1988) (breath analysis); United States v. Allen, 337 F.Supp. 1041…
  • …, 239 N.L.R.B. 179 (1978); see also Iowa Express Distribution, Inc. v. NLRB, 739 F. 2d 1305, 1311 (8th Cir.1984) (alter ego analysis is appropriate where the second corporation was formed before the first corporation ceased operating), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1088, 105 S.Ct. 595, 83 L.Ed.2d 704 (1984). This circuit has stated: The focus of the alter ego doctrine, unlike that of the single employer doctrine, is on the existence of a disguised continuance of a former business entity or an attempt to avoid the…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw