RUCKELSHAUS, ADMINISTRATOR, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

v.

UNION CARBIDE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234 (U.S. 1985)
  …rts of Appeals for the First and Eighth Circuits. See Ciampa v. Massachusetts Rehabilitation Comm’n, 718 F. 2d 1 (CA1 1983); Miener v. Missouri, 673 F. 2d 969 (CA8), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 909 (1982). We granted certiorari to resolve this conflict, 469 U. S. 1032 (1984), and we now reverse. II The Eleventh Amendment provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another…
• Liparota v. United States, 471 U.S. 419 (U.S. 1985)
• Thomas v. Union Carbide Agric. Prods. Co., 473 U.S. 568 (U.S. 1985)
  …rbitration. App. to Juris. Statement la-4a. The District Court reinstated its prior judgment enjoining the operation of the data-consideration provisions as violative of Article III. EPA again took a direct appeal and we noted probable jurisdiction. 469 U. S. 1032 (1984). This Court stayed the judgment pending disposition of the appeal. II As a threshold matter, we must determine whether appel-lees’ Article III claims demonstrate sufficient ripeness to establish a concrete case or controversy. Regional Rail…