PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO.
v.
MOSESIAN
PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO.
MOSESIAN
469 U.S. 932
Supreme Court of the United States (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Grand Jury Subpoena. TWO Grand Jury Contemnors v. United States, 826 F.2d 1166 (2d Cir. 1987)…that require[d] disclosure [of bank records] only if the bank ha[d] such accounts.” Id. at 117 (citations omitted) (emphasis in original). Relying on the Eleventh Circuit decision in United States v. Ghidoni, 732 F. 2d 814 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 932, 105 S.Ct. 328, 83 L.Ed.2d 264 (1984), we concluded that “executing th[e] directive would not implicate any testimonial communication,” and thus would not impair the appellant’s fifth amendment rights. 811 F. 2d at 117. In both Davis and In re N.D.…