OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE ET AL.

v.

KLAMATH INDIAN TRIBE

Citator

Cited By

• Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 472 U.S. 797 (U.S. 1985)
  …Faith and Credit Clause of Article IV of the Constitution prohibited the application of Kansas law to all of the transactions between petitioner and respondents. 235 Kan. 195, 679 P. 2d 1159 (1984). We granted certiorari to consider these claims. 469 U. S. 879 (1984). We reject petitioner’s jurisdictional claim, but sustain its claim regarding the choice of law. Because petitioner sold the gas to its customers in interstate commerce, it was required to secure approval for price increases from what was t…
• Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana, 472 U.S. 237 (U.S. 1985)
  …ive history of the 1924 Act and its construction by the Secretary of the Interior. Our concern that the Court of Appeals’ interpretation of the Act might have a significant effect on other titles acquired pursuant to § 17 led us to grant certiorari. 469 U. S. 879 (1984). We now reverse. HH < The word “hereafter” in the first clause of § 17 supports the Court of Appeals’ interpretation of the Act. Read literally, the statute seems to state unequivocally that no interest in Pueblo lands can be acquired “exce…
• Or. Dep't of Fish & Wildlife v. Klamath Indian Tribe, 473 U.S. 753 (U.S. 1985)
  …use the Court of Appeals’ decision appeared to conflict in principle with the decision of the Eighth Circuit in Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota, 614 F. 2d 1161 (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U. S. 905 (1980),14 we granted certiorari, 469 U. S. 879 (1984). We now reverse. I — I At issue in this case is an asserted right of tribal members to hunt and fish outside the reservation boundaries established in 1901, free of state regulation. The Tribe argues that this special right continued on the…