F/V BARANOF ET AL.

v.

ALASKA

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• Harper & Row v. Nation Enters., 471 U.S. 539 (U.S. 1985)
  …es to matters of high public concern.” Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F. 2d 1044, 1050 (CA2 1983) (construing 723 F. 2d 195 (1983) (case below) as allowing advertiser to quote Consumer Reports), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 823 (1984). Respondents advance the substantial public import of the subject matter of the Ford memoirs as grounds for excusing a use that would ordinarily not pass muster as a fair use — the piracy of verbatim quotations for the purpose of “scooping”…
• Morgan v. Ford, 6 F.3d 750 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …of social interest. As an employee grievance, Morgan’s speech was not a matter of public concern. See Connick, 461 U.S. at 146-47, 103 S.Ct. at 1690; Ferrara, 781 F. 2d at 1512; Renfroe v. Kirkpatrick, 722 F. 2d 714, 715 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823, 105 S.Ct. 98, 83 L.Ed.2d 44 (1984). That Morgan spoke on behalf of Sheila Parrish regarding Ford’s harassing behavior does not change the outcome. An employee’s speech will rarely be entirely private or entirely public. Rather than categorize ea…
• Cheryll Gray v. Lacke, 885 F.2d 399 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …of Gray’s petition-clause claims, could also be protected by her right to freedom of speech. See Renfroe v. Kirkpatrick, 722 F. 2d 714, 715 (11th Cir.) (referring to the filing of a grievance as speech and applying a speech analysis), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823, 105 S.Ct. 98, 83 L.Ed.2d 44 (1984). However, since the analysis for an alleged petition-clause deprivation is identical to that for free speech, our results would necessarily have to be the same.…