UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, APPELLANT,

v.

LENNIE L. HUMPHRIES, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Grimm v. Prudence Mut. Cas. Co., 243 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 1971)
  …Appeal that bona fide purchaser for value of stolen automobiles have an “insurable interest” therein. See, Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 220 So. 2d 389 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.1969) ; and Skaff v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 215 So. 2d 35 (1st D.C.A.Fla.1968). The district court in the present case distinguishes these cases saying that in each case the insured had an equitable interest in the car because of the money he had paid. This reasoning is not only inaccurate but is also inap…
• AETNA Ins. Co. v. Leste M. King, 265 So. 2d 716 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)
  …in its brief to the question of whether Mrs. King can be considered the beneficiary of a resulting trust. We do not find that issue to be relevant to a determination of this cause. . See Skaff v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Fla.App., 215 So. 2d 35 (1968). There, this Court speaking through Judge Spector held that an innocent purchaser who paid in excess of $4,000.00 for a stolen automobile had an “insurable interest” even though he had neither equitable nor legal title to the automobile. . L…
• Smith v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 231 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 1970)
  …ual Automobile Ins. Co., 220 So. 2d 389 (3d Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1969). . 154 So. 2d 313 (2d Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1963). . 176 So. 2d 909 (1st Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1965). . 177 So. 2d 712 (3d Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1965). . Skaff v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 215 So. 2d 35 (1st Dist.Ct.App.Fla.1968). . The amount of such damages are specified in the policy of insurance.…

Authorities Cited

• Eldred L. Tuggle and Catherine Tuggle v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 207 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 1968)
• Shaw v. State, 199 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)
• Richardson v. State, 199 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
• Edwards v. State, 211 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 1968)