OSTROSKY ET AL.

v.

ALASKA

Citator

Cited By

• Eckard v. The Honorable C. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, 483 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …ding resolution of the writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. In December 1982 appellants filed motions for discharge under the speedy trial rule. Said motions were later denied. Finally, in May 1984 the United States Supreme Court, 467 U.S. 1201, 104 S.Ct. 2380, 81 L.Ed.2d 339, vacated the judgment of the Florida Supreme Court and remanded the case to the Florida Supreme Court, 466 So. 2d 1064. The latter court then determined that the order of suppression was improper and remanded the matt…
• United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294 (U.S. 1987)
  …bit of the fourth amendment.” Id., at 1100. We granted the Government’s petition for certiorari, vacated the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remanded the case for further consideration in fight of Oliver v. United States, 466 U. S. 170 (1984). 467 U. S. 1201 (1984). On remand, the Court of Appeals reaffirmed its judgment that the evidence seized pursuant to the warrant should have been suppressed, but altered the legal basis supporting this conclusion: the large barn was not within the curtilage of the…
• Roland M. and Miriam M. v. The Concord Sch. Comm., 910 F.2d 983 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …on adjustments are not inconsistent with a finding that the IEP is legally sufficient. See Defendant I, 898 F. 2d at 1191; Denton, 895 F. 2d at 978; Rettig v. Kent City School Dist., 720 F. 2d 463, 466-67 (6th Cir.1983), appeal dism'd, cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1201, 104 S.Ct. 2379, 81 L.Ed.2d 339 (1984). . We take this proposition on appellants’ terms, assuming arguendo that Landmark may have been an optimum academic environment. We note in passing, however, that the first hearing officer found Concord’s prog…