NATIONAL ENQUIRER, INC.

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (JONES ET AL., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST)

Citator

Cited By

• Delo v. Stokes, 495 U.S. 320 (U.S. 1990)
  …ting the stay imposed by the Court of Appeals, the Court has resorted to an exercise of power that is unusual and that should only be resorted to on the rare occasion in which a lower court has flagrantly abused its discretion.” Wainwright v. Adams, 466 U. S. 964, 965 (1984). The Court does so on the basis of a rule that quite properly vests considerable discretion in the court most familiar with the facts of the case and its prior history. Title 28 U. S. C. § 2254 Rule 9(b) provides that: “A second or succ…
• Dobbert v. Wainwright, 468 U.S. 1231 (U.S. 1984)
  …committed a capital offense, the majority’s haste is particularly disquieting. * The frenzied rash to execution that characterizes this case has become a common, if Kafkaesque, feature of the Court’s capital cases. See, e. g., Wainwright v. Adams, 466 U. S. 964, 965 (1984) (Marshall, J., dissenting) (noting the Court’s “indecent desire to rush to judgment in capital cases”); Woodard v. Hutchins, 464 U. S. 377, 383 (1984) (Brennan, J., dissenting) (criticizing “rash to judgment” in Court’s decision to vacat…
• Moore v. Blackburn, 806 F.2d 560 (5th Cir. 1986)
  …er was denied evidentiary hearing and appointment of experts in state court and in federal court on his first federal habeas petition, and where statistical evidence he relied on became available only after prior federal habeas proceeding), vacated, 466 U.S. 964, 104 S.Ct. 2183, 80 L.Ed.2d 809 (1984), these studies are, under Fifth Circuit precedent, an inadequate statistical proffer. The claim that the pendency of McCleskey and Hitchcock before the Supreme Court justifies the reconsideration of Moore’s suc…