IN RE DISBARMENT OF ROUNDTREE

Citator

Cited By

• Texas v. New Mexico, 475 U.S. 1004 (U.S. 1986)
  …Chief Justice Burger, with whom Justice Blackmun and Justice Rehnquist join, dissenting. In Louisiana v. Mississippi, 466 U. S. 921 (1984), I dissented from an order of the Court granting fees to the Special Master. The basis for my dissent was that the hourly rates at which the Special Master sought fees for work performed by his junior associates, some of whom were only “summe…
• Texas v. New Mexico, 485 U.S. 953 (U.S. 1988)
  …n were members of the Bar; and about the lack of information as to hourly rates charged. Ibid. The Chief Justice cited his corresponding dissent to the allowance of compensation requested by this same applicant as Master in Louisiana v. Mississippi, 466 U. S. 921 (1984). He repeated his earlier observation that a Special Master’s charges, when allowed by the Court, “‘represent our assurance to the parties that the charges are reasonable and proper,’” and that this is so even where “the parties do not oppos…
• Kansas v. Colorado, 498 U.S. 933 (U.S. 1990)
  …, e. g., 493 U. S. 989.] Justice Blackmun. It seems to me that some aspects of the fees and expenses now requested by the Special Master come close — if they do not exceed — the limits of allowability. See the dissents in Louisiana v. Mississippi, 466 U. S. 921 and 923 (1984), and Texas v. New Mexico, 475 U. S. 1004 (1986). As was there pointed out, fees and expenses charged by a Special Master, when allowed by this Court, represent our assurance to the parties that the charges are reasonable and proper. A…