COUNTY OF ONEIDA, NEW YORK, ET AL.

v.

ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK STATE ET AL.; AND NEW YORK V. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK STATE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (44 total)

• AKE v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (U.S. 1985)
  …ate does not have the responsibility of [*74] providing such services to indigents charged with capital crimes.” 663 P. 2d 1, 6 (1983). Finding no error in Ake’s other claims,2 the court affirmed the convictions and sentences. We granted certiorari. 465 U. S. 1099 (1984). We hold that when a defendant has made a preliminary-showing that his sanity at the time of the offense is likely to be a significant factor at trial, the Constitution requires that a State provide access to a psychiatrist’s assistance on t…
• Cnty. of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y. State, 470 U.S. 226 (U.S. 1985)
  …mages. Id., at 542. The counties and the State petitioned for review of these rulings. Recognizing the importance of the Court of Appeals’ decision not only for the Oneidas, but potentially for many eastern Indian land claims, we granted certiorari, 465 U. S. 1099 (1984), to determine whether an Indian tribe may have a live cause of action for a violation of its possessory rights that occurred 175 years ago. We hold that the Court of Appeals correctly so ruled. The respondents in these cases are the direct…
• Lane v. Pena, 518 U.S. 187 (U.S. 1996)
  …, 878 (CA9 1980), rev’d on other grounds, 474 U. S. 936 (1985); Pushkin v. Regents of the Univ. of Colo., 658 F. 2d 1372, 1376-1380 (CA10 1981); Jones v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth., 681 F. 2d 1376, 1377, n. 1 (CA11 1982), cert. denied, 465 U. S. 1099 (1984). See Conference Report on the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1974, S. Rep. No. 93-1270, p. 27 (1974) (hereinafter Conference Report on 1974 Amendments) (noting that § 504 was intended to “permit a judicial remedy through a private action”)…