VANCE

v.

BORDENKIRCHER, WARDEN, WEST VIRGINIA STATE PENITENTIARY

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• United States v. Andrews, 850 F.2d 1557 (11th Cir. 1988)
  …se.6 United States v. Peel, 837 F. 2d 975, 979 (11th Cir.1988); United States v. Salinas, 654 F. 2d 319, 323 (5th Cir. Unit A Aug. 1981), overruled on other grounds, United States v. Adamson, 700 F. 2d 953 (5th Cir. Unit B) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 833, 104 S.Ct. 116, 78 L.Ed.2d 116 (1983); United States v. Carroll, 582 F. 2d 942, 944 (5th Cir.1978). The indictment on which Andrews and Ford were tried charged that “[i]n or about early August, 1986, at Putnam County, Florida, in the Middle Judicial…
• United States v. Rochester, 898 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1990)
  …reof, including the FHLBB. Record Vol. 10 at 141. Taking the jury instructions as a whole, this instruction was sufficient to instruct the jury on the specific intent requirement. See United States v. Adamson, 700 F. 2d 953 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 833, 104 S.Ct. 116, 78 L.Ed.2d 116 (1983). Fiduciary Relationship Rochester’s argument that the district court’s definition of a fiduciary relationship permitted the jury to convict based on Odessa’s loss of intangible rights fails when juxtaposed wit…
• United States v. Morales, 978 F.2d 650 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …s established by proof that the defendant knowingly participated in a deceptive or fraudulent transaction. United States v. Blanco, 920 F. 2d 844, 845 (11th Cir.1991); United States v. Adamson, 700 F. 2d 953, 965 (11th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 833, 104 S.Ct. 116, 78 L.Ed.2d 116 (1983). The essence of Appellant’s argument is that the requested instruction properly clarified the intent element of the misapplication charge for the jury. Relying principally on United States v. Foshee, 569 F. 2d…