ARCHER ET AL.
v.
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY ET AL.
ARCHER ET AL.
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY ET AL.
464 U.S. 802
Supreme Court of the United States (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LeSASSIER v. Chevron USA, Inc., 776 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1985)…U.S. 1071, 94 S.Ct. 584, 38 L.Ed.2d 477 (1973). Appellant can cite neither legislative history nor valid case law in support of his interpretation. n. Relying on Thompson v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc., 419 So. 2d 822 (La.1982), appeal dism’d, 464 U.S. 802, 104 S.Ct. 48, 78 L.Ed.2d 69 (1983), appellant further argues that the district court erred in concluding that the exclusivity provisions of the OCSLA/LHWCA scheme apply to a retaliatory discharge claim because such a claim does not involve “disabil…
-
O'Neal Mills, Sr. v. Dir., Off. OF Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't OF Labor, McDermott, Inc., & Crawford & Co., 877 F.2d 356 (5th Cir. 1989)…ave foreclosed LHWCA benefits coverage for OCS platform employees when adjacent states extend their workers’ compensation schemes to those platforms. See, e.g., Thompson v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc., 419 So. 2d 822 (La.1982), appeal dismissed, 464 U.S. 802, 104 S.Ct. 48, 78 L.Ed.2d 69 (1983). The reference to OCS workers indicates that, at most, Congress was prepared to tolerate overlapping federal and state workers’ compensation coverage on the OCS itself. But the proviso's deletion does not justify…