DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF MONTANA

v.

FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSOULA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• T.W. Elec. Serv., Inc. v. Pac. Elec. Contractors Ass'n, 809 F.2d 626 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …ls may also impose such sanctions, see McConnell v. Critchlow, 661 F. 2d 116, 118-19 (9th Cir.1981); Limerick v. Greenwald, 749 F. 2d 97, 101-02 (1st Cir.1984); United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 697 F. 2d 491, 494-95 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144, 103 S.Ct. 3128, 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983); 10 C. Wright, A. Miller & M. Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2670, at 219-20 (1983). The law of this circuit requires that imposition of costs and fees under § 1927 may be made only on a finding that…
• Eastway Constr. Corp. v. The City OF NEW York, 821 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1987)
  …llate Procedure in determining what amount of legal fees are to be awarded as a sanction for a frivolous appeal. See, e.g., United States v. Potamkin Cadillac Corp., 697 F. 2d 491, 495 (2d Cir.) (double costs plus $500 attorney’s fee), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144, 103 S.Ct. 3128, 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983); In re Hartford Textile Corp., 659 F. 2d 299, 306 (2d Cir. 1981) (double costs plus $5,000 attorney’s fee), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018, 102 S.Ct. 1714, 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982). The case law under Rule 11 also…
• C.L. Taylor v. Texgas Corp., 831 F.2d 255 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …ir.) (evidence is not newly discovered where defendant’s attorney admitted that he knew of the evidence prior to the granting of summary judgment and could give no plausible explanation as to why the evidence was not produced earlier), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1144, 103 S.Ct. 3128, 77 L.Ed.2d 1379 (1983).8 The mere fact that Texgas is a large company does not excuse it from informing its employees of the identity of its legal opponents and from requiring its employees to report any dealings with those opponent…