BETKA
v.
SMITH ET AL.
BETKA
SMITH ET AL.
462 U.S. 1125
Supreme Court of the United States (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
E.J. Wilson v. Attaway, 757 F.2d 1227 (11th Cir. 1985)…s.” T. 1712-13. The discretion of the trial court concerning admissibility of evidence applies to determinations of admissibility under Rule 803(8)(C). In re Plywood Antitrust Litigation, 655 F. 2d 627, 637 (5th Cir.1981) (Unit A), cert. dismissed, 462 U.S. 1125, 103 S.Ct. 3100, 77 L.Ed.2d 1358 (1983); Control Components, Inc. v. Valtek, Inc., 609 F. 2d 763, 769 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1022, 101 S.Ct. 589, 66 L.Ed.2d 484 (1980). We find no abuse of discretion. The trial court’s remarks about the…
-
Warna Irene Lewis v. Pearson Found., Inc., 908 F.2d 318 (8th Cir. 1990)…Ct. at 726-27. We have similarly characterized the right established by Roe v. Wade as “the constitutional freedom of a woman to decide whether to terminate her pregnancy.” Nyberg v. City of Virginia, 667 F. 2d 754, 756 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1125, 103 S.Ct. 3102, 77 L.Ed.2d 1358 (1983). While Scott makes clear that section 1985(3) creates no substantive rights,2 Roe v. Wade establishes certain fundamental rights which have been proclaimed with great force by the Supreme Court: Few decision…