ARANA-ARGUELLO

v.

UNITED STATES; AND VELIZ-VALLARDES V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Daniels v. Blackburn, 763 F.2d 705 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …making that decision. Daniels does make claims on appeal that, liberally construed, amount to an attack on the competence of counsel. These allegations come too late. See, e.g., French v. Estelle, 696 F. 2d 318, 319-20 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937, 103 S.Ct. 2108, 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983).…
• Jones v. Thigpen, 741 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …deed. In light of Jones’ sufficiency argument and of our obligation to reach claims that may bear double jeopardy significance, see French v. Estelle, 692 F. 2d 1021 (5th Cir.1982), modified on other grounds, 696 F. 2d 318 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 461 U.S. 937, 103 S.Ct. 2108, 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983), we can find no basis consistent with the purposes behind Enmund and the policies served by the Double Jeopardy Clause to dissect the Enmund rationale to avoid a double jeopardy bar. B Enmund requires that bef…
• Stokes v. Procunier, 744 F.2d 475 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …e enhanced sentence was improper because the State failed to introduce any evidence that he committed the second felony after the first felony conviction had become final. We agree. See French v. Estelle, 692 F. 2d 1021 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 937, 103 S.Ct. 2108, 77 L.Ed.2d 313 (1983). The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Stokes’ sentence, relying on a presumption that the offense underlying the second conviction was committed within the five-year limitations period preceding the filing o…