DUVALLON

v.

FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Dario Restrepo, 946 F.2d 654 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …ion to be the act of delivering controlled substances into the hands of another_ There is no ambiguity.” United States v. McDonald, 692 F. 2d 376, 379 (5th Cir.1982) (declaring two acts of distribution to be two distinct criminal acts) cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1073, 103 S.Ct. 1531, 75 L.Ed.2d 952 (1983); see also United States v. Thompson, 624 F. 2d 740, 742 (5th Cir.1980). Further confirmation of the distinct criminal status of individual drug sales is provided by the fact that the prosecutor was free to cha…
• United States v. Andrade, 788 F.2d 521 (8th Cir. 1986)
  …appellants’ contentions that the prosecutor excluded blacks from the jury in this case for impermissible reasons and hence no basis for any constitutional claims. See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 696 F. 2d 578, 593 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1073, 103 S.Ct. 1531, 75 L.Ed.2d 952 (1983). Having found that the record supports the government’s claim that the prosecutor’s peremptory challenges were exercised for permissible trial related concerns and not race, we reject appellants’ contentions th…
• United States v. Leslie, 783 F.2d 541 (5th Cir. 1986)
  …istrict judge, granted a new trial under Rule 33 “in the interest of justice” because the prosecutor used all six of his peremptory challenges against blacks.6 Likewise, in [*573] United States v. Jackson, 696 F. 2d 578 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1073, 103 S.Ct. 1531, 75 L.Ed.2d 952 (1983), the trial judge issued an order granting the defendant’s motion “to prevent the use of peremptory challenges by the prosecution to strike black or other minority members from the jury ... unless the government…

  ← 1 / 2 →