DURHAM DISTRIBUTORS, INC., ET AL.
v.
BOMBARDIER LTD. ET AL.; JUDD V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1983-01-24
Nos. 79-1853; No. 82-5051
459 U.S. 1189 Supreme Court of the United States (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hutchins v. Woodard, 730 F.2d 953 (4th Cir. 1984)
    …and the effective frustration of the right which the state has, in a proper case, to seek the death penalty. See State v. Pinch, 306 N.C. 1, 9-10, 292 S.E. 2d 203, 213, cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1056, 103 S.Ct. 474, 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982), reh’g denied, 459 U.S. 1189, 103 S.Ct. 839, 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1983): It would have amounted to an absurdity and a mockery of our law to have permitted these jurors to sit on a case where imposition of the death penalty was an available sentencing option. For, if capital cases…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw