FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• State v. Learnhart Rhoden, 448 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 1984)
  …fashioned primarily for use in trial proceedings. The rule is intended to give trial judges an opportunity to address objections made by counsel in trial proceedings and correct errors. See Simpson v. State, 418 So. 2d 984 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1156, 103 S.Ct. 801, 74 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1983); State v. Cumbie, 380 So. 2d 1031 (Fla.1980); Clark v. State, 363 So. 2d 331 (Fla.1978). The rule-prohibits trial counsel from deliberately allowing known errors to go uncorrected as a defense tactic and as a…
• Holton v. State, 573 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 1990)
  …erruled. The objection itself calls the court’s attention to the error alleged to have prejudiced the party making the objection and to the possibility that a mistrial may be in order.3 Simpson v. State, 418 So. 2d 984, 986 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1156, 103 S.Ct. 801, 74 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1983). We thus proceed to the merits of the issue. The first objection was to negative comments by the prosecutor on Holton’s courtroom demeanor and remarks that a drawing penned by Holton during a police interview…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Lara v. State, 464 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 1985)
  …The court sustained an objection by appellant’s counsel, but there was neither a request for a curative instruction nor a motion for mistrial. Under the circumstances, we find no error. See Simpson v. State, 418 So. 2d 984 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1156, 103 S.Ct. 801, 74 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1983); Clark v. State, 363 So. 2d 331 (Fla.1978). [*1181] From our review of the entire record, the imposition of the death penalty in this cause is proportionately correct. For the reasons expressed, we affirm appel…