HOHMAN

v.

PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Julita De Parias, 805 F.2d 1447 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …Amendment. Federal courts are undecided as to whether the involuntary removal of hair samples constitutes a search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. Compare In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Mills), 686 F. 2d 135, 137-40 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1020, 103 S.Ct. 386, 74 L.Ed.2d 517 (1982) (involuntary removal of facial and scalp hair in grand jury proceeding not search and seizure), with Bouse v. Bussey, 573 F. 2d 548, 550 (9th Cir.1977) (warrant-less plucking of pubic hair violates Constitution)…
• United States v. Jones, 766 F.2d 994 (6th Cir. 1985)
  …nce of the practice by the Supreme Court, United States v. Mara, 410 U.S. 19, 20 (1973); id. at 24 (Douglas, J., dissenting), and by other courts of appeals. E.g., In re Grand Jury Proceeding (Mills), 686 F. 2d 135, 140 n. 4 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1020 (1982); United States v. Cosby, 601 F. 2d 754, 757-58 & n. 6 (5th Cir.1979); United States v. Stanford, 589 F. 2d 285, 292 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 983 (1979). In Stanford, the court viewed the practice as a laudable effort to help pre…