COTTON

v.

MABRY, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Citator

Cited By

• In re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States, 918 F.2d 374 (3d Cir. 1990)
  …ing) (noting private benefits of certain privileges, including the “priest-penitent” privilege, in critiquing majority opinion concerning use-fruits immunity following the invocation of the privilege against adverse spousal testimony), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1015, 103 S.Ct. 375, 74 L.Ed.2d 509 (1982); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 563 F. 2d 577, 587 (3d Cir.1977) (Gibbons, J., concurring) (critiquing federal common-law legislative privilege found to exist by majority and contrasting this privilege to privile…
• In re Detroit Auto Dealers Ass'n, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 955 F.2d 457 (6th Cir. 1992)
  …13; Connell, 421 U.S. at 621, 622, 95 S.Ct. at 1834, 1835. This exemption may-only be asserted by a labor organization itself, not by employers. James R. Snyder Co. v. Associated Gen. Contractors, 677 F. 2d 1111, 1118 n. 10 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1015, 103 S.Ct. 374, 74 L.Ed.2d 508 (1982); United States v. Hutcheson, 312 U.S. 219, 232, 61 S.Ct. 463, 466, 85 L.Ed. 788 (1941). The nonstatutory labor exemption is not so narrowly limited; it extends antitrust immunity to both labor unions, employees…