CALIFORNIA

v.

SHIRLEY

Citator

Cited By

• Bundy v. State, 471 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 1985)
  …scientifically recognized danger of unreliability of such testimony outweighs its probative value as a matter of law, or for a combination of such reasons. See, e.g., People v. Shirley, 31 Cal.3d 18, 641 P. 2d 775, 181 Cal. Rptr. 243, cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1125, 103 [*14] S.Ct. 13, 73 L.Ed.2d 1400 (1982); People v. Gonzales, 415 Mich. 615, 329 N.W. 2d 743 (1982). We believe a discussion of the rationale underlying some of these particular decisions is warranted. In early 1981, the Arizona Supreme Court…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Flanagan v. State, 586 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …Kelly-Frye general acceptance standard. The Bledsoe decision was in keeping with the following observations made in the court’s earlier opinion in People v. Shirley, 31 Cal.Sd 18, 51-54, 723 P. 2d 1354, 1374-75, 181 Cal.Rptr. 243, 264, stay denied, 458 U.S. 1125, 103 S.Ct. 13, 73 L.Ed.2d 1400, cert. denied, 459 U.S. 860, 103 S.Ct. 133, 74 L.Ed.2d 114 (1982):21 Nor are those techniques necessarily limited to manipulation of physical evidence: we do not doubt that if testimony based on a new scientific proce…
• Pennsylvania v. Del. Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (U.S. 1986)
  …h and several groups of Pennsylvania legislators attempted to intervene in the litigation. Delaware Valley successfully opposed all of these attempts. Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air v. Commonwealth, 674 F. 2d 970 (CA3), stay denied, 458 U. S. 1125 (1982). Phase VII. As noted above, a portion of the District Court’s contempt order prevented the United States Secretary of Transportation from authorizing the expenditure of any federal funds for federal highway projects in Pennsylvania that did…