IN RE WANTLAND; IN RE RICE; AND IN RE FELICIANO

Citator

Cited By

• City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95 (U.S. 1983)
  …ion of mootness, reciting the facts but arguing that the case was not moot. Lyons in turn filed a motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted. We denied that motion but reserved the question of mootness for later consideration. 457 U. S. 1115 (1982). In his brief and at oral argument, Lyons has reasserted his position that in light of changed conditions, an injunctive decree is now unnecessary because he is no longer subject to a threat of injury. He urges that the preliminary injunctio…
• United States v. Louisiana, 470 U.S. 93 (U.S. 1985)
  …red these pleadings to its Special Master, the Honorable Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., who already had been appointed in United States v. Louisiana (Louisiana Boundary Case), 394 U. S. 11 (1969). See 444 U. S. 1064 (1980); 445 U. S. 923 (1980). See also 457 U. S. 1115 (1982). Following extended proceedings, the Special Master has submitted his Report to this Court. [*98] I — I As noted above, the Submerged Lands Act employs but does not define the term “inland waters.” In United States v. California, 381 U. S. 1…