PHELPS

v.

KANSAS SUPREME COURT ET AL.; STANDARD DRYWALL, INC. V. UNITED STATES; HATCH ET UX. V. MADSEN, SUPERINTENDENT OF BANKS OF ARIZONA, RECEIVER, ET AL.; THOMPSON V. SOUTH CAROLINA; NZONGOLA V. NZONGOLA; NZONGOLA V. NZONGOLA, WADE V. TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Lehder-Rivas, 955 F.2d 1510 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …actual prejudice will demonstrate that the lower court abused its discretion by failing to sequester the jury. United States v. Hill, 496 F. 2d 201, 203 (5th Cir.1974); see Baldwin v. Blackburn, 653 F. 2d 942, 948 (5th Cir. Aug. 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1112, 102 S.Ct. 2918, 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982). a. Presumed prejudice A criminal defendant is not constitutionally entitled to trial by jurors ignorant about relevant issues and events. United States v. Padilla-Martinez, 762 F. 2d 942, 951 (11th Cir.), cer…
• Baldwin v. Maggio, 704 F.2d 1325 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …s corpus yielded consideration of the merits of his claims; all were, nonetheless, rejected. Baldwin v. Blackburn, 524 F.Supp. 332 (W.D.La.), aff’d 653 F. 2d 942 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 950, 102 S.Ct. 2021, 72 L.Ed.2d 475, reh. denied 457 U.S. 1112, 102 S.Ct. 2918, 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982) (hereinafter Baldwin II). The Louisiana trial court then ordered Baldwin to be electrocuted on May 27,1982. Ten days before his sentence was to be carried out, Baldwin initiated the present proceedings for po…
• Milgard Tempering, Inc. v. Selas Corp. OF Am., 902 F.2d 703 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …ods conform. Second, it ensures that the buyer will receive goods conforming to the contract specifications within a reasonable period of time. See Chatlos Systems v. National Cash Register Corp., 635 F. 2d 1081, 1085 (3d Cir.1980), cert. dismissed, 457 U.S. 1112, 102 S.Ct. 2918, 73 L.Ed.2d 1323 (1982); S.M. Wilson & Co. v. Smith Int'l, Inc., 587 F. 2d 1363, 1375 (9th Cir.1978) (citing Eddy, On the “Essential” Purposes of Limited Remedies: The Metaphysics of U. C. C. Section 2-719(2), 65 Calif.L.Rev. 28, 63…