ROBINSON

v.

CITY OF JUNCTION CITY

Citator

Cited By (75 total)

• Hall v. State, 444 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …l is not to go free because the prosecutor blundered,” court ordered disciplinary proceedings to be conducted against Assistant United States Attorney); see generally, United States v. Modica, 663 F. 2d 1173 (2d Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989, 102 S.Ct. 2269, 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982); Murray v. State, supra; Jackson v. State, 421 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).3 On this record, the judgment below is therefore Affirmed. . The other has no merit and requires no discussion. . One of the remar…
• Boatwright v. State, 452 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
  …w. Hines v. State, 425 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), petition for rev. denied, 430 So. 2d 452 (Fla.1983); Simmons v. Wainwright, 271 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). See generally United States v. Modica, 663 F. 2d 1173 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 989, 102 S.Ct. 2269, 73 L.Ed.2d 1284 (1982). It diverts the jury’s attention from the task at hand and worse, prompts the jury to consider matters extraneous to the evidence. This type of argument is calculated to inflame the passions or prejudices of t…
• City of Akron v. Akron Ctr. for Reprod. Health, Inc., 462 U.S. 416 (U.S. 1983)
  …ate, may require that all second-trimester abortions be performed in a hospital,9 we granted both Akron’s and the plaintiffs’ petitions. 456 U. S. 988 (1982). We denied the intervenors’ petition, Seguin v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 456 U. S. 989 (1982), but they have participated in this Court as respondents under our Rule 19.6. We now reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals upholding Akron’s hospitalization requirement, but affirm the remainder of the decision invalidating the provisi…