RELIFORD

v.

CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT

Citator

Cited By

• Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt Cupp, 745 F.2d 1221 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …ities, Franklin moved that the court appoint him new counsel. The court denied the motion. We review the district court’s decision under the abuse of discretion standard. See United States v. McQuade, 647 F. 2d 938, 940 (9th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 958, 102 S.Ct. 1470, 71 L.Ed.2d 677 (1982). A motion for appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and is granted only in exceptional circumstances. McQuade, 647 F. 2d at 940. Franklin failed…
• Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …94 (9th Cir.1965). Madden was then cited for the rule in Alexander v. Ramsey, 539 F. 2d 25, 26 (9th Cir.1976); United States v. McQuade, 579 F. 2d 1180, 1181 (9th Cir. 1978), on appeal after remand, 647 F. 2d 938, 940 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 958, 102 S.Ct. 1470, 71 L.Ed.2d 677 (1983); Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F. 2d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir.1980); and Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F. 2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir.1984). A finding of exceptional circumstances requires an evaluation of both “the likelihood of su…
• Miles v. Dep't OF THE Army, 881 F.2d 777 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …ir.1986). A district court’s action or inaction regarding appointment of counsel is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F. 2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir.1984); United States v. McQuade, 647 F. 2d 938, 940 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 958, 102 S.Ct. 1470, 71 L.Ed.2d 677 (1982). III. As an initial matter, the district court did not err in dismissing Miles’ pre1983 and 1987 claims of discrimination. Federal regulations require that a federal employee bring his grievance to the attent…