FOSTER
v.
HARRISON, WARDEN, FORT PILLOW STATE FARM
FOSTER
HARRISON, WARDEN, FORT PILLOW STATE FARM
454 U.S. 1100
Supreme Court of the United States (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Sears, 839 F.2d 302 (7th Cir. 1988)…ed to combine statistics for precharge and post-charge periods, because “[ajctions taken subsequent to the filing of E.E.O.C. charges cannot moot issues of discrimination occurring prior to that time”), aff'd, 659 F. 2d 736 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1100, 102 S.Ct. 674, 70 L.Ed.2d 641 (1981); cf. Capad v. Katz & Besthoff, Inc., 711 F. 2d 647, 655-57 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 927, 104 S.Ct. 1709, 80 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984). These cases are all characterized by an assumption that employer pr…
-
United States v. Clark, 743 F.2d 1255 (8th Cir. 1984)…nable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing” a felony. 18 U.S.C. § 3061(a)(3). “Reasonable grounds” is the equivalent of probable cause. United States v. Roberson, 650 F. 2d 84, 86 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1100, 102 S.Ct. 675, 70 L.Ed.2d 642 (1981). See United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 415-16 n. 4, 96 S.Ct. 820, 823-824 n. 4, 46 L.Ed.2d 598 (1976). On appeal, Clark maintains that the inspectors lacked probable cause to arrest him, and consequently,…