LEE STOLLER ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (55 total)

• United States v. Pepe, 747 F.2d 632 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …t. 175, 78 L.Ed.2d 157 (1983). That each conspirator may have contemplated participating in different and [*660] unrelated crimes is irrelevant. United States v. Lee Stoller Enterprises, Inc., 652 F. 2d 1313, 1319 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082, 102 S.Ct. 636, 70 L.Ed.2d 615 (1981). Finally, there is no requirement that each defendant must have agreed to commit two predicate acts of racketeering activity. United States v. Carter, 721 F. 2d 1514, 1528-31 (11th Cir.1984). The government nee…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Hartley, 678 F.2d 961 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …n labeled as “a carefully crafted piece of legislation.” Ianelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770, 789, 95 S.Ct. 1284,1295, 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975), quoted in United States v. Lee Stoller Enterprises, Inc., 652 F. 2d 1313, 1316 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082, 102 S.Ct. 636, 70 L.Ed.2d 615 (1981). Its primary purpose was “to eradicate organized crime and corruption.” Id. at 1317. While government prosecutors may not initially have made active use of the statute, it has subsequently become a formidable we…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …104 S.Ct. 175, 78 L.Ed.2d 157 (1983). That each conspirator may have contemplated participating in different and unrelated crimes is irrelevant. United States v. Lee Stoller Enterprises, Inc., 652 F. 2d 1313, 1319 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1082, 102 S.Ct. 636, 70 L.Ed.2d 615 (1981). Finally, there is no requirement that each defendant must have agreed to commit two predicate acts of racketeering activity. United States v. Carter, 721. F. 2d 1514, 1528-31 (11th Cir.1984). The government nee…